ExamCompetition Forum Question Papers Ask A Question Mock Test Learn & Earn Sign Up Login Menu



0 vote

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below Nepal’s Prime Minister K.P. Oli just paid a three-day state visit to India, his first foreign visit after taking office on February 15 this year, and his second visit to India as prime minister. During the visit, from A

Asked on by | Votes 0 | Views: 15 | Tags: reading comprehension     | english comprehension     | Add Bounty

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below

Nepal’s Prime Minister K.P. Oli just paid a three-day state visit to India, his first foreign visit after taking office on February 15 this year, and his second visit to India as prime minister. During the visit, from April 6 to 8, Nepal and India signed just three new agreements — a partnership in agriculture, as well as plans for connectivity through inland waterways and expanding linkages to connect Indian railway lines to Kathmandu — breaking the tradition of signing a long list of documents. Both sides described the three initial agreements as “path breaking agreements” to boost connectivity between the two countries. The two prime ministers also inaugurated a petroleum pipeline to be constructed between India and Nepal. Oli’s trip to Nepal’s southern neighbor was keenly watched in both the national and regional arena for a couple of reasons: his anti-India rhetoric during the campaign season, his determination to expand cooperation with China to decrease dependency on India, and the strong expectation that he would try to resolve several pending contentious issues with India. The much-publicized and much-awaited visit to India, however, produced less in substances and more in rhetoric. Both sides have kept contentious issues at bay, stating that they want to build up a forward-looking approach in bilateral relations. In fact, for their domestic political constituencies, both prime ministers had to display that bilateral relations are back on track, underplay their differences. Thus, their points of emphasis were more on the cosmetic side instead of focusing on genuine bilateral issues.This time, a 12-point joint statement was issued, avoiding key contentious issues between two countries. Before the visit, there were expectations that Oli, with a two-third’s majority and popular mandate at home, would take up the issue of revising the Peace and Friendship Treaty. During the campaign, Oli often talked about the revising the 1950 treaty, saying that it is unequal for Nepal. The beginning point of the Oli government’s agenda of “resetting and redesigning” relations with India is revising or scrapping the treaty, which has served as the bedrock of bilateral relation since 1950. The joint press statement issued after Oli’s visit does not say anything about the revision of the treaty, however; this too had been mentioned on the previous visits.

The Nepal-India Eminent Persons’ Group (EPG) is revisiting all bilateral agreements to submit a comprehensive report to both governments on how to reset bilateral relations. However, without substantial negotiations at the government level, progress on revising the treaty is highly unlikely. Border disputes between two countries are another contentious issue that occasionally creates friction in bilateral relations. To enhance people-to-people relations, Nepal and India must resolve contentious issues relating to the border, including the two major areas of dispute at Susta and Kalpani. Four years ago, the two countries agreed to start talks at the foreign secretary-level in order to resolve the problems at Susta and Kalapani; however, not a single talk in this regard has taken place yet. Before embarking on his visit to India, there was pressure on Oli to raise those issues with Indian political leadership but the issue was not mentioned in the bilateral documents. Aside from the disputes in Susta and Kalapani, there is a need for construction, restoration, and repair of boundary pillars, and the clearance of no man’s land on both sides. Besides the technical aspects, the disputes at Susta and Kalapani must be resolved through dialogue by the political leadership. However, the leaders of both sides seem unwilling to take up this contentious issue.Similarly, other several issues related to trade and transit were not mentioned in the joint press statement. There are pressures on the Modi-led government in India to enhance ties with Nepal on the basis of these principles and work with the Oli-led government, which commands a two-thirds majority in Nepal’s House of Representatives. Second, it seems that Oli has given a clear message to the Indian side that he wants to focus on economic diplomacy, to secure India’s support in his efforts to advance economic development and prosperity. In this context, both countries are preparing to focus on economic and development issues instead of political and other thorny bilateral issues. While addressing a business gathering on April 6 in New Delhi, Oli wondered why Indian investors are not investing in Nepal. “Indian investors have invested across the globe so why not to go to the next door Nepal? Geographical proximity, easy access, cultural similarities are all there to make you feel good about Nepal. Seize the opportunity,”

Oli told the business community. With the promulgation of new constitution in 2015 and the completion of all levels of elections last year, Nepal’s political transition has come to an end. Now the country is preparing to focus on building up its economy. Oli has already made economic development a prime factor of his external engagement. In an address to the international community on March 27, Oli said, “Development imperatives at home will be the guideposts for our diplomatic engagements abroad. Focused pursuit of economic development agenda at the international level will remain a key priority.”Oli further stated that that development and prosperity are universal goals and all nations have legitimate interest in achieving them. “We must therefore recognize the development space for everyone. Development must not be seen through the optics of geopolitics,” Oli said. As India and China are competing to increase their influence in Nepal, Oli is trying to balance policy with both neighbors through a special emphasis on economic development. Talking about neighborhood policy, Oli had said that mutual trust will be the key ingredient of Nepal’s relationships with India and China. “In particular, we will remain engaged in the ‘vibrant economic drive’ of the neighborhood with a view to benefitting from it. We respect the legitimate interests of our neighbors and will not allow anything against them in our soil,”  Oli said. With wrap up of his India’s visit, Oli’s next destination will be northern neighbor China, where he is expected to sign a few deals on projects related to China’s Belt and Road Initiatives (BRI). During his earlier tenure in 2016, Oli signed groundbreaking agreements with China, including on trade and transit, and there are hopes that Oli’s visit to China will expedite those plans. Oli plans to bring massive investment from both India and China to fulfill his domestic promises of economic development and prosperity.


Which of the following words is opposite in meaning to the word 'Imperative'
1). Exigent 
2). Vital
3). Pressing
4). Trivial


Share on Facebook      Share on Whatsapp       Share on Twitter




1 answers

2 vote
Answered by on | Votes 2 |
Imperative means 'of vital importance; crucial.' so do the words 'exigent, vital, pressing and critical.'  The correct word is 'trivial.' It means 'unimportant and lacking any significance.' So option 4 is correct. 

Join Telegram Group




Answer This Question

Name:
Email:
Answer :
Sum of (3+4)
Submit:

Other Questions

1. Arrange the sentences in a chronological order such that they form a proper passage. Sentence E is the SECOND statement and B is the FIFTH statement. A. The World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) estimate that tourism contributed 9.2 per cent of global GDP and forecasts that this wi

2. Which of the phrases given below can be placed in the blank to make a complete meaningful sentence which is grammatically correct too? If none of the options is appropriate choose option 5 that is 'none of these' as the answer. How do you feel when you not only complete that project, but also complete it ahead of the deadline, _______

3. Four words are given, out of which only one word is spelt correctly. Choose the correctly spelt word and click the button corresponding to it.

4. Which of the following is most opposite in meaning to the word given in bold as used in the passage.

5. Below, a passage is given with ten blanks labelled (A)-(J). Below the passage, five options are given for each blank. Choose the word that fits each blank most appropriately in the context of the passage, and mark the corresponding answer. The lengthy communiqué from the leaders published at

6. Many young artists were drop- ping names at the party to impress the gathering.

7. Read the sentence to find out whether there is an error in it or not. The error, if any, will be in one part of the sentence. The number of that part is the answer. If there is no error, the answer is (5). Ignore errors of punctuation, if any. Can you stop (1) being so prudish (2) all the time and (3) found yourself a positive attitude? (4) No error (5) 

8. Rearrange the following six sentences (a), (b), (c) , (d), (e) and (f) in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph; then answer the questions given below them.(a) The group of Egyptians provided answers to all his questions as they were impressed by the visitor?s keen observation and intel

9. In the following question, some part of the sentence may have errors. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the appropriate option. If a sentence is free from error, select 'No Error'. It is good ideas (A) / to study the culture (B)/ and lay of the country (C)/ you are going to visit

10. In the following question, some part of the sentence may have errors. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the appropriate option. If a sentence is free from error, select 'No Error'.  I look up (1)/ after the blast (2)/ of light enveloped the park. (3)/ No error (4)